2/1/2024 0 Comments Photoninja video![]() ![]() Features include adaptive lighting: illumination control can lighten shadows, overcome backlighting, and tame excessive contrast with a natural, detail enhancement: local contrast adjustment makes detail "pop" without halo artifacts and it also works in reverse for a nice smoothing effect, highlight recovery: can salvage many overexposed images with convincing recovery of blown-out highlight regions, color enhancement: improve skin tones, enhance foliage, deepen the sky, and create your own color, black and white processing: create monochrome and split-tone images with control over tonal interpretation, color correction: balance neutrals in a single click and achieve consistent color with on-location lighting profiles, and distortion correction: fix key stoning and correct complex lens distortion. Used by experts in the field such as RedBull Photography and Joel Grimes, Bloom is a one-stop solution for all your studio management needs. Bloom is an excellent CRM for photographers that’s great at handling the needs of both solopreneurs and larger businesses. Photo Ninja offers an integrated suite of state-of-the-art enhancement and correction tools. The Top 15 CRM For Photographers In 2023. You need to do your own investigation on which look you like better.Photo Ninja is a RAW converter that delivers exceptional detail, image quality, distinctive, and natural look. For Web viewing, all four softwares can give you a decent image. Or maybe Iridient can’t handle the X-Trans II sensor of the X100s. I can’t believe it makes that much difference. I’m thinking it’s the noise reduction since the second image is at ISO 800. For the second set, it gave the worst output. For the first set of images, Irident seems to have the best output. Thomas Leveritt has produced UV portraits and videos to show. I just don’t like the weird tint in the images, especially in the first image. ftpID5494 Photo Ninja: For Focus Stacking: Helicon Focus. But I think that’s because I’m so used to seeing Lightroom’s renderings. The sky w Show more Show more Tom Peters Photography 1.6K. Detail wise, Iridient seem to pull more out. Barrel Rock Landscape Photography PhotoNinja Vlog 3 An early morning start to try and shoot the sunrise down at my local beach. The skin tone looks better compared to the other software. ![]() But I still can’t get over that weird tint the image has.Ĭapture One wins. PhotoNinja’s version looks pretty good too. Is it the noise reduction that Iridient tried to give? I like Capture One’s output the best. Wow, for these images, Iridient looks the worst. Capture One Iridient Photo Ninja Lightroom Once again, you can click on them to get a better view. Capture One Iridient PhotoNinja Lightroom Once again, these are straight out of the camera using the software’s default settings. The settings for these are f/4.0, 1/250 sec at 800 ISO using my Fuji X100s. I can’t get over PhotoNinja’s weird colors though. The other three are about the same at its default settings. Thee Photo Ninja, Saint Petersburg, Florida. It looks like Iridient captures the details better. Hopefully, you can still tell the difference. For PhotoNinja, I had to take a screen shot again. You can click on them to get a bigger size. These are screen grabs from each software. Click on the items below to learn more about this powerful tool, and read why serious. They all have different tones to the image. Photo Ninja is truly special, with unique capabilities for improving and optimizing your digital images. Right away, you can tell these are different. Capture One Iridient PhotoNinja LightRoom The following images are shot at f/4.0, 1/125 sec, at 200 ISO with my Fuji X-E1. Since my trial license for PhotoNinja expired, I had to take a screen shot. But I want to see what gives me the best starting point. Sure, maybe if we fiddle with stuff, we can get almost identical outputs. The samples are straight out of the camera with no adjustments. So you have to figure out what gives you the best possible look that you’re going for. Disclaimer: I am terrible at noise reduction - so I wanted to find a tool that would let me easily deal with noise in my imagesAfter comments on my previous. The software can be downloaded for free and a two-week license code is available on-request from PictureCode. This 129 software, available for Mac and Windows, gives photographers one more option. Sure, certain software can bring out details better. Prior to the release of Photo Ninja 1.2, there were very few Raw converters out there for X-Trans. This isn’t just a pixel peeping exercise. ![]() I want the best RAW processor to get the best out of the X-Trans sensor. Why portraiture? Because that’s the style of photography I do. So I decided to try them and see how they handle RAF files for portraiture. There has been alternatives such as PhotoNinja, Iridient, and Capture One. We know that everyone complains about how Adobe handles Fuji RAF files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |